«« The Dilution of Beta Communicating and Collaborating on a Vision »»
blog header image
Object-File Persistence Layers and Durham

The more I read about Hibernate the more I realise that Durham is just a object-file persistence layer. Object persistence has been done over and over. Why do it again?

That's a darn good question -- maybe I shouldn't be. What if Hibernate could be extended to do file persistence instead of database persistence? That might save me a lot of work. What if there are already file persistence libraries out there that could do the job?

Clearly I should investigate more but that doesn't mean the Durham specification is a waste. It will provide a basis for requirements I need to look for in a third party library and give me an idea of the amount of work to get that library the way that I want it.

Same goes for the AudioMan2 functional spec because it depends on Durham and has requirements of its own.

Posted at February 16, 2005 at 04:04 AM EST
Last updated February 16, 2005 at 04:04 AM EST
Comments

Dear Mr. Lowe,
I just posted to your Bell Mobility blog, but I am interested in knowing if you have any family history knowledge? My great-great grandmother was Isabelle Lowe, born 1837 in Québec. She had a sister named Bridget, and her mother was Catherine. They were living in Pennsylvania by 1850. Their Canadian history is a mystery (sorry for the rhyme!) Do you have any knowledge about your "Lowe" family? Thanking you.
(I tried to email you at the address on this page, but it said "no name exists") so I am trying this blog site.
Sincerely yours,
Sharon Doré

» Posted by: Ms. S. Dore at February 16, 2005 06:29 PM
Google
 
Search scope: Web ryanlowe.ca