| «« Jon Stewart on C-SPAN | Canadian Tire Service Leaves Me Unimpressed »» |
|
About
I'm Ryan Lowe, a Software Engineering graduate living in Ottawa, Canada. I like agile software development and Ruby on Rails.
I write this blog in Canadian English and don't use a spell checker. Typos happen.
Projects
» Full-time Ruby on Rails freelancer
» Full-time with Rails since May 2005 » Former committer for RadRails (now Aptana) » I also have a few Rails side-projects in development: 1. wheretogoinTO.com Toronto nightlife 2. Hey Heads Up! TODO list and sharing 3. Layered Genealogy family history research 4. foos for foosball scoring 5. fanconcert for music fans (on hold) Hiring Rails developers? I can telecommute by the hour from Ottawa, Canada »» Email: rails AT ryanlowe DOT ca
BulletBlog
Now hosted on Hey! Heads Up -- check it out!
Syndication
Pings
Recent
Derek Lowe's (Ryan's older brother) words at Ryan's funeral
blog@ryanlowe.ca no more Forging Email Headers: Good, Bad or Ugly? Sarcastic Dictionary (Part 1 of Many) Tags Hierarchies Twisting Rails is Risky Business Risky Business? My Take on Early Alphas Whoa, it's August 2007 Closing Comments A Postscript to "Growth at the grassroots" »» All Blog Posts
Linkage
del.icio.us/ryanlowe
technorati/ryanlowe.ca/blog Aurora Roy Jim Andrew Trasker Travis Kibbee Karen Dr. Unk Ayana Van Bloggers Joel Spolsky Robert Scoble Tim Bray Dave Winer Raymond Chen James Robertson Ruby/Rails Bloggers rubyonrails.org weblog David Heinemeier Hansson Dave Thomas James Duncan Davidson Mike Clark Jamis Buck Signal vs. Noise Tobias Luetke Amy Hoy: (24)slash7 Jeremy Voorhis Eclipse Bloggers Planet Eclipse EclipseZone Luis de la Rosa Eclipse Foundation Kim Horne Billy Biggs Ian Skerrett Mike Milinkovich Bjorn Freeman-Benson Denis Roy
Archives
|
You Can't Be an Expert at Everything
It's pretty easy to put myself in the shoes of people that are mystified by computers -- all I have to do it think about cars. It's not that cars are extremely complicated machines, it's just that I am ignorant of car construction simply because I'm not that interested in learning about it. It's this same disinterest that people have with computer hardware and software construction. It takes time they'd rather be spending on other things. These people want to be able to get from point A to B -- just like I do in my car -- without having to learn about stuff they aren't interested in. I do think I should learn more about cars though, especially because I'm driving a 13 year-old used vehicle that (of course) will have its share of worn out parts. I'm trying to learn about front driveaxles, suspension and ball joints because that's what's broken at the moment. The Haynes repair manual for my car has helped a lot. Maybe I'll be able to get away with slowly learning this stuff but it's nice to have some relatives and friends that are knowledgable about cars so that I don't have to be. It goes to show that it's good to know experts in different fields: technology, automotive, real estate, law, finance, business, engineering, etc. You don't need to know all of the details of the other field because you trust the expert's judgement. That saves you time just as you do for them by giving your expertise. It's wonderfully symbiotic, as long as you're knowledgable about something and are able to help others. Posted at October 30, 2004 at 04:23 PM ESTLast updated October 30, 2004 at 04:23 PM EST Comments
You mispelled symbiotic. » Posted by: Jimmy at October 30, 2004 06:40 PMIt's a typo, but yeah ... it's still ironic that it's linked to a dictionary.com entry. » Posted by: Ryan at October 30, 2004 06:46 PMIt's also ironic that you misspelled "misspelled" ... but now we're getting off topic. ;) » Posted by: Ryan at October 30, 2004 06:49 PMIt's amazing the way people deal with computers though. It's way different then the way people deal with cars. You don't see people going out and buying cars without knowing how to drive them. People who have absolutely no idea how to use a computer go out and buy them everyday. They also never get them fixed, until they are completely broken. People will take their car to the shop the minute they hear a weird noise, or smell something weird. A computer can be running at a quarter of the speed it should be, and crashing every 30 minutes, and people still won't take it into get it fixed. It's a good thing that people don't treat their cars the way they do their computers, or there'd be a lot of people stranded on the highway. » Posted by: Kibbee at October 30, 2004 07:35 PMI guess that's the difference though: a computer crash won't kill ya. yuk yuk » Posted by: Ryan at October 30, 2004 07:45 PM
But you still go and get it tuned. I don't know of anybody who takes their computer in for a tune up. Some computer geeks tune their computers themselves, but that's kind of different. I wonder if there's money to be made in computer tune-ups? Cleaning out the dust, getting rid of all the junk programs that people have never used past the day they installed them. Ensuring all the connections are good and that everything is in good working order. Computers would last much longer if they were taken better care of. » Posted by: Kibbee at November 1, 2004 08:27 AMIt's definitely interesting that people don't do that Kibbee, especially since arguably computer hardware/software is more complicated than an automobile or a bike. It can be expensive to just get your computer cleaned up. Now that computer prices are low, it's almost worth waiting until you had to upgrade so you can just buy a new machine. :) It's just like hen people were having problems with Windows 98 getting slow after a few years (months in my case), they'd ask me "what can we do? delete a bunch of files? defrag?" and I said that it was much easier just to format the hard disk and start over. That's starting to be the case now with some spyware and viruses too. The detection programs are good, but they don't catch eveything. Some people just end up nuking everything. » Posted by: Ryan at November 1, 2004 08:51 AMI think one of the reasons that it is easier to just format and reinstall everything is that people wait so long to fix anything. They usually wait till their computer is completely useless. By that time the best thing to do, is to format. If the computer is cleaned often enough, the spyware/stuff that's not needed can be cleaned much easier. » Posted by: Kibbee at November 1, 2004 12:20 PMI think that if you could get a brand new car for 1-2k $, people would not actually get it tuned up at all. If things are working badly on your car and you could just "reinstall" everything to get it back to 100%, why would you bother to maintain it? I don't think people would, just because people are lazy. Just think about all the people who lease new cars all the time at that large cost? Why do they do it? To have a new car and not to have to maintain it. Really, I think that you guys are comparing apples and oranges. » Posted by: Jim at November 1, 2004 12:33 PMIt's true that car and computer repair require different considerations, but it's interesting to discuss why. While some software might be cheap to just reinstall like Windows 98, other large-scale enterprise software is not. It might be much cheaper to bring in someone to come in and "clean things up" than it would be to buy a new product. Understanding that break-even point is useful for for software engineers because the solution isn't always to make something new or reinstall. Often the customer just wants the cheapest thing that solves the problem to their satisfaction. » Posted by: Ryan at November 1, 2004 01:59 PMMaybe the reason that Windows is so easy to install is because people wouldn't use it if it wasn't. If my Linux system needed to be formatted and reinstalled as much as windows, then I would not be using Linux. » Posted by: Kibbee at November 1, 2004 02:54 PM |