| «« Tim Bray Hired By Sun | Broken Window Theory »» |
|
About
I'm Ryan Lowe, a Software Engineering graduate living in Ottawa, Canada. I like agile software development and Ruby on Rails.
I write this blog in Canadian English and don't use a spell checker. Typos happen.
Projects
» Full-time Ruby on Rails freelancer
» Full-time with Rails since May 2005 » Former committer for RadRails (now Aptana) » I also have a few Rails side-projects in development: 1. wheretogoinTO.com Toronto nightlife 2. Hey Heads Up! TODO list and sharing 3. Layered Genealogy family history research 4. foos for foosball scoring 5. fanconcert for music fans (on hold) Hiring Rails developers? I can telecommute by the hour from Ottawa, Canada »» Email: rails AT ryanlowe DOT ca
BulletBlog
Now hosted on Hey! Heads Up -- check it out!
Syndication
Pings
Recent
Derek Lowe's (Ryan's older brother) words at Ryan's funeral
blog@ryanlowe.ca no more Forging Email Headers: Good, Bad or Ugly? Sarcastic Dictionary (Part 1 of Many) Tags Hierarchies Twisting Rails is Risky Business Risky Business? My Take on Early Alphas Whoa, it's August 2007 Closing Comments A Postscript to "Growth at the grassroots" »» All Blog Posts
Linkage
del.icio.us/ryanlowe
technorati/ryanlowe.ca/blog Aurora Roy Jim Andrew Trasker Travis Kibbee Karen Dr. Unk Ayana Van Bloggers Joel Spolsky Robert Scoble Tim Bray Dave Winer Raymond Chen James Robertson Ruby/Rails Bloggers rubyonrails.org weblog David Heinemeier Hansson Dave Thomas James Duncan Davidson Mike Clark Jamis Buck Signal vs. Noise Tobias Luetke Amy Hoy: (24)slash7 Jeremy Voorhis Eclipse Bloggers Planet Eclipse EclipseZone Luis de la Rosa Eclipse Foundation Kim Horne Billy Biggs Ian Skerrett Mike Milinkovich Bjorn Freeman-Benson Denis Roy
Archives
|
Wikipedia
I have found a replacement for everything2: the much more formal Wikipedia. I shouldn't say that it is a complete replacement though, some of the stuff on everything2 is just completely off the wall, rude, sexist, opinionated, gross (it could be archived as a fairly accurate picture of mostly young male geeks during and after the high tech bubble). It replaced it for me though, because all of the extra stuff in everything2 is a distraction from the information that is actually useful -- the good parts of everything2 cut through the bull and gave a nice brief bit of information on most subjects, especially technology. It was really nice to be able to go to everything2 and type in an acronym and get a nice description back. It's moderation system is restrictive because of the people that use the site, and it also prevents the site from gaining momentum. Eventually the moderators can't keep up. Wikipedia is a more serious and formal attempt and therefore doesn't have the same misuse issues as everything2. So what is Wikipedia? Well, first you should understand what a wiki is: a web site that lets you edit its contents along with other people. So if you see a mistake, you can just go in and fix it right away. The moderation system consists of thousands of people that use the site and correct the mistakes of others as they come across them. They can also add more information and increase the size of the encyclopedia, through easy linking of pages within the wiki and elsewhere. The result is a fairly accurate and very cross-linked source of information. Because Wikipedia is backed by a wiki, if someone comes along and erases a page or vandalizes it, the page can be put back to it's original proper state very easily. All of the past versions of the page are stored by the wiki and can be compared to the current version of the page. I have to stop myself after browsing Wikipedia for a while. It's like the web was originally: additive to keep following links around and exploring. It's really easy to get off-track, just like in everything2. Granted everthing2 is often more amusing than interesting. It's interesting to note that the inventors of HTTP originally saw the web being this way in the first place: more collaborative. Instead the web is mostly read-only web pages which largely serve the interests of their owner. Only now, when social software is starting to become mainstream, do we realise the power that a community of people can have. The Wikipedia is a great example: in three years they already have over 200,000 articles -- and that's just the English ones. It's a pretty amazing demonstration of the power of collaboration, community self-moderation and great software. Posted at March 18, 2004 at 05:07 AM ESTLast updated March 18, 2004 at 05:07 AM EST Comments
I haven't looked at the site yet, but my initial question is: How to they ensure the information is accurate? I would be a little worried working off facts that other people contributed as opposed to from a book written by experts...
That is the beauty of having a Wiki. People have the ability to edit the content if the information is incorrect. When an inaccuracy is introduced, as long as "knowledgeable" people reading the wiki, it will be picked up and fixed by another. I have one here at work so that my team can have a centralized information base. » Posted by: James at March 18, 2004 09:20 AMThat's true, I wouldn't consider it to be an "attributable source" because of the nature of the editing. However, for me it is not that formal and for researchers it could be a good starting point. It's generally very good quality but I think you're right though -- it can't be seen as an reliably accurate source of information since it can be altered so easily. Many of the posts have links to external sources of information, like published articles or books though ... places to do more "official research". » Posted by: Ryan at March 18, 2004 07:34 PMI definitely have to say that Everything2 is a very useful site. Usually when I want to find out some obscure fact, I go there. It's amazing the amount of stuff that's up there. I really haven't tried wikipedia yet. I'll have to take a look at it someday. And oh yeah. It's the crazyness of Everthing2 that I like so much. I sometimes just fine myself following link after link after link, just to read about random stuff. » Posted by: Kibbee at March 19, 2004 01:11 AMThis is a good review of this amazing website. Good job Ryan ;) » Posted by: Edouard at April 28, 2004 02:56 AM |