| «« I C UR IM | Abstractulate Yourself »» |
|
About
I'm Ryan Lowe, a Software Engineering graduate living in Ottawa, Canada. I like agile software development and Ruby on Rails.
I write this blog in Canadian English and don't use a spell checker. Typos happen.
Projects
» Full-time Ruby on Rails freelancer
» Full-time with Rails since May 2005 » Former committer for RadRails (now Aptana) » I also have a few Rails side-projects in development: 1. wheretogoinTO.com Toronto nightlife 2. Hey Heads Up! TODO list and sharing 3. Layered Genealogy family history research 4. foos for foosball scoring 5. fanconcert for music fans (on hold) Hiring Rails developers? I can telecommute by the hour from Ottawa, Canada »» Email: rails AT ryanlowe DOT ca
BulletBlog
Now hosted on Hey! Heads Up -- check it out!
Syndication
Pings
Recent
Derek Lowe's (Ryan's older brother) words at Ryan's funeral
blog@ryanlowe.ca no more Forging Email Headers: Good, Bad or Ugly? Sarcastic Dictionary (Part 1 of Many) Tags Hierarchies Twisting Rails is Risky Business Risky Business? My Take on Early Alphas Whoa, it's August 2007 Closing Comments A Postscript to "Growth at the grassroots" »» All Blog Posts
Linkage
del.icio.us/ryanlowe
technorati/ryanlowe.ca/blog Aurora Roy Jim Andrew Trasker Travis Kibbee Karen Dr. Unk Ayana Van Bloggers Joel Spolsky Robert Scoble Tim Bray Dave Winer Raymond Chen James Robertson Ruby/Rails Bloggers rubyonrails.org weblog David Heinemeier Hansson Dave Thomas James Duncan Davidson Mike Clark Jamis Buck Signal vs. Noise Tobias Luetke Amy Hoy: (24)slash7 Jeremy Voorhis Eclipse Bloggers Planet Eclipse EclipseZone Luis de la Rosa Eclipse Foundation Kim Horne Billy Biggs Ian Skerrett Mike Milinkovich Bjorn Freeman-Benson Denis Roy
Archives
|
Objecting to Objects
Joel talks about the Law of Leaky Abstractions. I don't think anything new is in this, but the organization of all of it into one article is a Good Thing. It's true that you have to have some balance between flexbility and encapsulation/abstraction. The more you abstract, the more you tie yourself down. Object-zealots used to preach that you could go infinitely into the object universe abstracting layer by layer, but this does you no good if something breaks on a lower layer and you don't know how to fix it, let alone recognize it is broken. Maybe what is really needed are some reliable abstraction layers. Many of these already exist for Internet communication protocols. What if there was a single abstraction for a buffer? Couldn't we guarantee that software using this buffer wouldn't have buffer overflow errors? Of course there's the issue of languages, and performance. Sometimes fast performance trumps explicit checking. But we could be getting into an age of software development now where performance takes a back seat to security and reliablility for once. Not for games or graphics obviously, but mainstream software development could benefit from it. Posted at November 15, 2002 at 05:51 PM ESTLast updated November 15, 2002 at 05:51 PM EST Comments
|